By Dayne Hudson

I'd like to think that one of the benefits of shoes, is to cover up your ugly toes.
So when gym/fitness shoes hit the market highlighting our 5 ugly friends on each foot - people took note.
But what was the point of them?
Apparently, it was to promote better running form and reduce your chance of injury, as these shoes don't have much in the way of heel padding at all - which promotes a FOREFOOT (FF) landing.
It's been argued for some time that a forefoot running style is more economical than a REARFOOT (RF) running style.
So, a fresh study (1) examined exactly this. The research involved taking 19 habitual RF runners and 18 habitual FF runners - and measuring their steady-state rates of oxygen consumption and carbohydrate contribution to total energy expenditure.
The authors concluded:
"The results suggest that the FF pattern is not more economical than the RF pattern."
Further research conducted this year (2) found toe shoes to be an injury threat, with the authors stating: "injury may also occur from the added stress of running without the benefit of cushioning under the foot."
The study involved 36 recreational runners, who underwent an MRI scan before and after a 10 week period.
17 of them ran in their traditional shoes for 10 weeks, whilst the other 19 "gradually transitioned to Vibram FiveFinger running shoes for 10 weeks."
WHAT THEY FOUND
The posttraining MRI scores showed that more subjects in the Vibram FiveFinger running shoes group (10 of 19) "showed increases in bone marrow edema in at least one bone after 10 wk of running than that in the control group."
This led the authors to conclude:
"Runners interested in transitioning to minimalist running shoes, such as Vibram FiveFingers, should transition very slowly and gradually to avoid potential stress injury in the foot."
SQUATTING and TOE SHOES

The authors noted:
"Wearing weightlifting shoes seems to be beneficial in reducing the overall trunk lean, because this position is believed to reduce the amount of shear stress in the lower back area. Back squat with weightlifting shoes also increased foot segment angle and possibly contributes to greater muscle excitation in knee extensors."

CONCLUSION
ARTICLE UPDATE:
6 months after this article was written, on May 7 2014, Vibram USA (the company who makes these FIVEFINGERS running shoes) were forced to settle a lawsuit that alleged they made false and unproven claims about their footwear.
The company also agreed to refund consumers who had complaints about their shoes.
This was reported right around the world, including here in the Wasington Post.
Stay Fit, Stay Flexed!
(2) Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH, Hunter I, Robinson E, Rich BS, Brown SD. Foot bone marrow edema after a 10-wk transition to minimalist running shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jul;45(7):1363-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182874769.
(3) Sato K, Fortenbaugh D, Hydock DS. Kinematic changes using weightlifting shoes on barbell back squat. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jan;26(1):28-33. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318218dd64.
(4) Charniga A. Why weightlifting shoes? Retrieved on 3 Mar 2010 from http://www.dynamic-eleiko.com/sportivny/library/farticles015.html
(5) Kilgore L & Rippetoe M. Weightlifting shoes 101. Retrieved on 3 Mar 2010 from http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Weightlifting/WeightliftingShoes.html
(6) Kongsgaard, M., Aagaard, P., Roikjaer, S., Olsen, D., Jensen, M., Langberg, et al. (2006). Decline eccentric squat increases patellar tendon loading compared to standard eccentric squat. Clinical biomechanics, 21, 748-754.
(7) Brown S. (2013) "ELECTROMYOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF BAREFOOT SQUAT: A CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE." The Honors College University Honors Program East Tennessee State University.




